<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freedom is &#8216;Diatribe&#8217;, censorship at Digg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://morality101.net/blog/digg-diatribe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://morality101.net/blog/digg-diatribe/</link>
	<description>Liberty without Force</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:00:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tasine</title>
		<link>http://morality101.net/blog/digg-diatribe/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Tasine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morality101.net/blog/?p=1245#comment-125</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why Striker was banned.  So he posted the same thing several times.  I&#039;ve seen that a lot on Digg.  Nothing in his comments is abusive, nasty, bigoted, angry, profane, or derogatory.

It seems he wanted to get his message out.  Could that possibly be the problem?  Could be some people don&#039;t like his message, hmmm?

Striker&#039;s comments, compared with some from the other side, are gentle and loving, sweetness and light.  I personally have been called some filthy names on Digg by people on the other side, people who lean toward socialism.  Only after months of that did I ever report anyone.  Striker didn&#039;t do any of those things.  Why banned?  I&#039;d really like to know, and I doubt it was for &#039;spamming&#039;.

Digg can ban anyone it chooses to, but it would be wise to take care not to ban only the intelligent diggers and then be left with only liberal swill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why Striker was banned.  So he posted the same thing several times.  I&#8217;ve seen that a lot on Digg.  Nothing in his comments is abusive, nasty, bigoted, angry, profane, or derogatory.</p>
<p>It seems he wanted to get his message out.  Could that possibly be the problem?  Could be some people don&#8217;t like his message, hmmm?</p>
<p>Striker&#8217;s comments, compared with some from the other side, are gentle and loving, sweetness and light.  I personally have been called some filthy names on Digg by people on the other side, people who lean toward socialism.  Only after months of that did I ever report anyone.  Striker didn&#8217;t do any of those things.  Why banned?  I&#8217;d really like to know, and I doubt it was for &#8216;spamming&#8217;.</p>
<p>Digg can ban anyone it chooses to, but it would be wise to take care not to ban only the intelligent diggers and then be left with only liberal swill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

