<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Definitions and doublespeak &#124; Liberal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://morality101.net/blog/defines-liberal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://morality101.net/blog/defines-liberal/</link>
	<description>Liberty without Force</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:00:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tasine</title>
		<link>http://morality101.net/blog/defines-liberal/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Tasine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morality101.net/blog/?p=1272#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Before I finished reading the defs, I said &quot;liberalism no longer has any true meaning whatsoever&quot;.  As it turns out, that&#039;s essentially what Striker says!  It doesn&#039;t.  And why would that be?  I suppose now we will seriously have to call them socialists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I finished reading the defs, I said &#8220;liberalism no longer has any true meaning whatsoever&#8221;.  As it turns out, that&#8217;s essentially what Striker says!  It doesn&#8217;t.  And why would that be?  I suppose now we will seriously have to call them socialists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

